MISSING PIECE IN SUPER JIGSAW PUZZLE

It is a sad reality that many individual’s planned superannuation nest egg for retirement may be inadequate to sustain expectations of their retirement years, says the Institute of Public Accountants (IPA).

“There is extensive legislation that regulates how much and the manner in which Australians contribute to superannuation, but limited rules relating to how they can withdraw superannuation,” said IPA chief executive officer, Andrew Conway.

“Many retirees take either a partial or total lump sum, with a high percentage of these using a lump sum to pay off a mortgage or purchasing other non income supporting assets.  A smaller percentage of retirees are investing in a pension product such as an annuity or life pension, or an income earning product such as a bank account.

“While the IPA supports choice in superannuation, the current use of retirement funds is not always appropriate and does little to diminish the future pension burden faced by a shrinking workforce and aging population.

“The IPA therefore believes there should be suitable incentives which encourage retirees to invest in income streams such as pension and annuity products.

“Annuities may be the missing link in people’s thinking between drawing down from their existing superannuation and finding sustainable income streams that support their retirement.

“The Financial System Inquiry’s (FSI) findings also support the need for people to be encouraged to take income streams in retirement instead of lump sums.  The FSI report recommended that annuities be offered as the default option for how to access superannuation after retirement.

“This would mean that people need to opt out in order to receive a lump sum payment, which is the more common method of withdrawing super currently.  The FSI report stated that greater use of annuities may help retirees’ super savings go further, and reduce the need for them to draw on the age pension.

“Annuities support the policy intentions of the superannuation system and will generally better provide for the longer term needs of retirees and protect against cost of living risks,” said Mr Conway.